This is a reprint of an article in
Direct Marketing Magazine. The author
has taken the liberty of making minor
edits for clarity.
How to Harness the Awesome Power of Word
of Mouth.
By George Silverman
President, Market Navigation, Inc.
Marketers are overlooking the obvious.
Word of mouth is far and away the most
powerful force in the marketplace. Yet,
it is the most neglected. Companies have
vice presidents of sales, advertising,
and marketing. But there is not a single
vice president of word of mouth in any
corporation in the country. Why?
Presumably, because most people think
that they cannot do much about word of
mouth. Most marketers believe that word
of mouth is out of their control. They
believe that it can be influenced, to
be sure, by advertising and other marketing
media, but cannot be influenced directly.
The obvious thing that they are overlooking
is that word of mouth can be harnessed.
It can be directly influenced, causing — under
the right circumstances — a stampede
of customers to your products that cannot
be stopped by your competitors.
Chances are, your product is more influenced
by word of mouth than anything else.
You and your competitors put huge amounts
of information into the marketplace in
the form of marketing materials, events,
and salespeople. The illusion is that
these things directly influence sales.
The reality is that all the while, your
customers are talking over that information
and helping each other decide what to
do. Word of mouth is the reality that
intervenes between your communication
and sales.
Word of mouth is more credible than
your most sincere salesperson. It is
able to reach more people, faster, then
advertising, direct-mail, and even the
Internet, because it can spread like
wildfire. It breaks through the clutter
better than anything:
“Even those deaf to the bragging
cries of the marketplace will listen
to a friend,” as one highly successful
marketer put it.
Even more important than its credibility,
reach, speed and ability to break through
the clutter, is its ability to get people
to act. In study after study, with almost
every category of buyer, word of mouth
has been shown to be what is known as
the proximal cause of purchase — the
most recent thing that happened just
before purchase. In other words, the
purchase trigger.
People tend to make purchases on the
advice of trusted peers or experts.
Even more amazingly, word of mouth happens
spontaneously, without you having to
be there, and, unlike your other media,
it doesn’t cost you a dime.
If you could only harness it..
How to harness word of mouth
The idea that word of mouth cannot be
controlled as one of the biggest marketing
oversights. It will surprise most marketers
to find out that word of mouth can be
controlled at least as much as advertising,
salespeople, public relations, coupons,
samples, promotions, and other marketing
media and tactics. (Most things in life
cannot be completely controlled!)
So how then do we harness word of mouth?
First, there is a lot more about this
strange and powerful force than is generally
understood about it. We have to know
the nature of the beast before there
is any chance of taming it, harnessing
it, and directing its power. Then we
have to have a way to monitor and track
it, to sneak up on it and observe it.
Then, and only then, can we learn how
to speed up, change its direction, and
turn it into a stampede toward our product.
Stalking the beast: what is this strange
creature?
Word of mouth is one of those things
that everybody thinks they understand,
yet realize soon that they are talking
about a different part of the elephant.
By “word of mouth” I mean
informal communications about products,
services or ideas between people who
are independent of the company providing
the product or service, in a medium independent
of the company.
In contrast, advertising is a communication
of a message that you originate, in a
medium that you own or rent. A sales
message is a “company line” delivered
by representative of the company. Word
of mouth is originated by a third party,
transmitted spontaneously in a way that
is somehow independent of the party being
talked about. So in word of mouth, both
the message and a medium are independent.
In that sense, public relations is actually
one form – by no means the only
form – of word of mouth.
What makes word of mouth so powerful?
It is this independence that gives it
much—though, as we will see later,
by no means all—of its power. If
you ask most people why word of mouth
is so powerful, they will tell you that
it is because of its objective, independent, “no
axe to grind” nature. Why is that
so important? Because a decision maker
is more likely to get the whole, undistorted
truth from an independent third party
then someone who has a vested interest
in promoting your point of view. It is
this unique credibility that gives word
of mouth much of its power.
That explains why word of mouth is often
negative. It is the only place where
the decision maker is likely to hear
about the negatives of the product. So
when people ask someone about a product,
they are likely to ask, “Had any
trouble with X?” Because they know
that it is the only source of information
where they are likely to get a straight
answer.
Another reason that word of mouth is
so often negative is that people are
three to ten times more likely to tell
others about a negative experience than
a positive one. Many studies have shown
that a satisfied customer is likely to
tell approximately three people, while
a dissatisfied customer is likely to
tell approximately 11 people. This is
because the positive experiences are
expected and soon forgotten, but the
unresolved negatives get people angry
and frustrated, energizing word of mouth.
Studies have also shown that unexpected
extraordinary service also causes strong
positive word of mouth. In fact, some
of the strongest and most frequent word
of mouth results when a dissatisfied
customer is turned around by an extraordinary
response to their expression of dissatisfaction.
So, as we have seen, word of mouth can
be a positive force because of its credibility,
but often destructive because of its
negativity.
The unknown reason why word of mouth
is so powerful
But there is another reason why word
of mouth so powerful. This reason is
even more important and useful than word
of mouth’s independent credibility.
It takes some explanation.
When the person is deliberating about
purchasing a product, he reaches a point
where he wants to try the product. Why?
He wants to get real world, but low risk,
experience in his situation. Up until
then, everything is informal, abstract,
somewhat removed from the real world.
He has to know how the product “will
actually work out in the real world.” He
needs experience.
There are only two ways to get experience:
directly or indirectly. Now you would
think that direct experience—actually
trying the product—is the best
teacher. But it is the most costly in
time, money, and risk of failure. Also,
you cannot afford the time and money
to try a new product directly too much,
so your sample tends to be small.
Indirect experience—that is, hearing
about other people’s experience—is
actually much better in many ways: someone
else is footing the bill and spending
the time. You can pool the experiences
of several people so as to have a greater
sample. If the trial fizzles, their reputations
are damaged, not yours.
All in all, indirect, vicarious experience
is the better deal. Of course, it is
not an either/or situation. You might
try the product a little yourself and
also talk with others.
By now, you probably see where I'm going
with this. Talking with others about
the product, comparing experiences and
helping each other sort it out is one
form of word of mouth. In fact, it is
the most powerful form of this most powerful
marketing force. It happens just at the
point of maximum involvement, just when
they are thinking about trying the product,
just when they are making their crucial
decisions about the product: Will it
work? In my situation? Should I make
a major commitment here? How should I
interpret any negative experiences?
To summarize: the thing that gives word
of mouth most of its power is the fact
that it is an experience delivery mechanism.
And it is successful experience that
triggers full adoption behavior more
than anything else.
Let me give you a quick example. Let
us say a new drug comes out which holds
considerable promise for helping to alleviate
the symptoms of a disease. Physicians
read the studies and talk to the salespeople
from the company. That is how they know
that the drug holds promise. But how
do they know it will work out in actual
practice? They try it on a few patients
who have not responded well to existing
drugs. These, of course, are the patients
on whom the drug is least likely to be
effective, but it is easiest to justify
trial in these cases. Physicians typically
try a drug on five of these refractory
patients. One gets better, one stays
the same, one gets worse, one has other
possibly unrelated complications, and
one moves to Florida. These results are
uninterpretable, so he has to wait for
five more low risk situations in which
to try the drug. This typically goes
on for years, until enough experience
accumulates so that physicians can talk
with each other and share success stories,
tips, and suggestions for coping with
problems, and other experiences that
make the pool large enough for physicians
to form reliable opinions. Then, and
only then—after a few years have
elapsed—the chain reaction reaches
critical mass and explodes into enough
word of mouth to cause to drug to grow
rapidly into full usage, sometimes in
a matter of months.
This pattern of acceptance is similar
for most business-to-business, industrial,
high-tech, and professional products.
It is even true for many consumer products,
especially those that are not easily
tried. The time frame and other details
may be different. But what is the same
is the fact that it is the time it takes
to accumulate enough favorable experience—and
to communicate that experience—to
make a reasonable decision is what determines
a product’s success and the speed
with which it is accepted. It is the
content, speed, and sources of word of
mouth that mediate the process and act
as the accelerator or brake on the speed
of adoption.
So, to summarize: speed of experience
gathering determines the speed of product
adoption. Word of mouth determines speed
of experience gathering. Therefore, word
of mouth determines speed of product
adoption.
Other reasons why word of mouth is the
most powerful persuader in the marketplace
There are some other reasons why word
of mouth is so powerful. Even though
you already know most of them, seeing
them all summarized in one place will
probably make you realize why word of
mouth is even more powerful than most
people recognize.
It is more relevant and complete. Word
of mouth is “live,” not canned
like most company communication. That
means it is custom tailored to the people
who are participating in it. People are
not giving a pitch, they are responding
to questions, though most important questions,
the ones the decision-makers themselves
are asking. Therefore, customers pay
more attention to what because it is
perceived as more relevant and more complete
than any other form of communication.
It is the most honest medium. Because
it is custom tailored, and because people
are independent of the company, it is
the most honest medium. And customers
know it. Advertising and salespeople
are notoriously biased and not fully
truthful. The inherent honesty of word
of mouth further adds to its credibility.
It is customer driven. Closely related
to the above, word of mouth is the most
customer driven of all communication
channels. The customer determines who
she will talk to, what she will ask,
whether she will continue to listen or
politely change the subject, etc.
It is a mysterious, invisible force.
Despite all of its overwhelming power,
like the wind of a hurricane or the neutrons
of a nuclear chain reaction, it is invisible.
It is sometimes called “underground” communication,
or the grapevine. You see its effects
all right, much more than likely it is
due to your (or your competitors’)
active promotional efforts. For instance,
you take a bunch of actions, such as
sending out a load of materials and ads
launching a product. You see an effect
in the marketplace. What could be more
natural than to think that your action
caused the effect? Actually, it is more
than likely that your actions sparked
a word-of-mouth chain reaction, and it
was the word of mouth that caused the
effects. Why should you care, as long
as you get the desired effect? Because
many products succeed despite the marketing
supporting it, for different reasons
than the product’s most-emphasized
benefits. If the advertising and sales
force were aligned with the word of mouth,
you could have had a faster launch, at
a much lower cost. It is what will go
down the word of mouth channel—and
be amplified by it—that should
drive advertising and sales, not the
other way around. This is a paradigm
shift. It is the Copernican Revolution
of marketing: Traditional marketing revolves
around word of mouth, not the other way
around.
It feeds on itself. Word of mouth is
like a breeder reactor. It is self generating,
it feeds on itself. It does not use up
anything. If 10 people have 10 experiences,
that is 100 direct experiences. If they
each tell 10 people about their own experiences,
that is an additional 1000 (indirect)
experiences, which can be just as powerful
as the direct experiences. If they each
tell ten people, that is an additional
1,000 people who now have 10,000 experiences
in their heads. And so on.
It does not take much time for everyone
to hear about the wonders of the product,
often several times each, which provides
additional confirmation (“Everybody’s
talking about.”).
Word of mouth is unlimited. A magazine
ad, in contrast, may be seen by two or
three people who read each copy. So,
you have to use mass media to hit a lot
of people, because it is limited to just
the direct and pass-along readers. Word
of mouth is unlimited. In theory, you
could tell just the right fountainhead
influencer, she would tell 10, who would
tell 10, who would tell 10, who would
tell 10, who would tell 10, who would
tell 10, who would tell 10, who would
tell 10. That is 100 million hits! Some
topical jokes — I am thinking of
some particularly tasteless O.J. Simpson
and Hillary Clinton jokes — made
the rounds like this (yes, actually starting
from one person!) in a matter of a day
or two.
It sometimes takes only one influencer
to start a stampede. I call this the law
of the fountainhead influencer.
Of course, in real life, you would try
to tell and convince dozens to hundreds
of leveraged influencers, thereby increasing
the chances of reaching critical mass
to sustain the word of mouth chain and
explosion. But more about this later.
Why are these fountainhead and leveraged
influencers powerful enough to spark
a chain reaction? Why don't they tell
a few people about the product only
to have the whole process peter out?
Because they are luminaries, experts,
gurus, and mavens. They each have a
sphere of influence that may be worldwide,
national, or local in nature. Their
sphere of influence may number in the
dozens up to the hundreds of millions.
These experts have one overriding attribute
that gives them their influence: trust.
People trust them to filter, distill,
and objectively evaluate the overwhelming
amount of information, make sense of
it, and present it in a recommendation
that is most likely to be right.
These tiers of experts and influencers
tend to initiate word of mouth, sustain
it, give it more credibility and supply
the initial bang that can start the chain
reaction of word of mouth.
For instance, I have several friends
who like to discover new restaurants
in the New York area. They read reviews
of reviewers (one form of expert) who
share their tastes, then fax my wife
and I reviews of restaurants that seem
to be worth trying. Often, they have
already sampled the restaurant, so they
can add a recommendation of their own.
I know a few people who have never steered
me wrong. So, when I need a restaurant
in a particular area, I call them. They
are my local influencers. The same with
movies, novels, business books, computers,
cars and so on. This phenomenon of people
trying to review things and engage in
word of mouth is the basis of the phenomenally
popular (and wonderful) Zagat guides
to restaurants and hotels. Notice the
word of mouth endorsement in the previous
sentence. The Zagat guides are an example
of the rare phenomenon of word of mouth
which is itself sold primarily by word
of mouth.
Word of mouth becomes one of the product’s
attributes
It is important to also notice that
the recommendation by experts becomes
part of the product’s attributes.
Your favorite movie star or director
may come out with a new movie. That is
one plus. But is now it is recommended
by one of your favorite reviewers, that
becomes part of the product. It is now “two
sums up” by Siskel and Ebert and
four stars by Leonard Maltin. These endorsements
and testimonials may be even more important
than who is in the movie. Now, if three
friends also loved it who share your
tastes – especially if they have
successfully recommended the movies you
have liked in the past – you are
going to see it. Notice that testimonials
are a major part of almost all movie
and book ads.
The important thing to remember here
is that the “recommended by” becomes
one of the product attributes, often
the most important one.
Experts Like To Influence
It should be obvious by now that the
source of the word of mouth is critically
important. But there are some consequences
of the importance of the source that
are not so obvious:
One of the reasons that the initial
stages of word of mouth are sustained
and can be spread so rapidly is that
influencers like to influence. That is
one of the reasons that they are influencers.
If they did not enjoy the process, they
would keep their mouths shut and their
keyboards still.
They like to talk with each other (and
almost always report that they do not
get enough of it), they like to influence
non-experts, and they like to teach.
So, they are surprisingly willing and
even eager to participate in the various
kinds of word-of-mouth programs that
I will describe later.
Word of mouth saves time and money
Another attribute of word of mouth is
that it can be extremely efficient. If
you want to buy a product that you do
not know too much about, the best way
is often to find a few people who have
investigated the products, and piggyback
on what they have found out.
Example: when I was looking for a supplier
to put up my Website, I decided to “ask
around.” The first person I asked
was a friend and business colleagues
who I have known for about 30 years.
He has extremely high standards and is
even more demanding that I am likely
to be of this type of supplier. He told
me that he had spent two weeks investigating
Internet service suppliers. Prices were
similar, but there were wide differences
in service, particularly willingness
to work along with customers who wanted
to do things that no one had ever done
before. He had found such a supplier
and opened up an account. Since I was
thinking about some innovative Web services,
this sounded perfect for my needs. My
friend warned me that the supplier had
a lower level communication link that
could potentially cause some bottlenecks,
but recommended that I take the chance
that they would upgrade soon.
To me it was a “no-brainer.” I
called the supplier, verified the prices,
and asked when they were going to upgrade
their telephone lines. They informed
me that it was about two weeks away.
I signed up immediately, and had my WebSite
up a few days later. They walked me through
everything and could not have been better.
The point here is that my friend saved
me at least a few days (he had taken
two weeks) of investigation. If a savvy
friend with high standards thoroughly
investigated and then had direct positive
experience, why should I waste my time
looking further? I could not go too far
wrong (I can always which are my domain
name to a different supplier), and I
was extremely unlikely to find anyone
better. Even if I could find a “better” supplier,
it would only be marginally better. That
would not have been worth even an extra
minute of my time.
Examples of word of mouth programs
and campaigns
There are ways of researching, causing,
delivering, amplifying, and steering
word of mouth in many different industries,
with many different products, and many
different kinds of people. Word of mouth
works differently in every industry,
but—as we will see—there
are basic principles that can be modified
and adapted for your industry.
Products are routinely made or destroyed
by word of mouth. Some examples:
Lexus automobiles regularly
conducts open houses for its customers.
During a recall, the company contacted
each customer individually and arranged
to fix the car in the customer’s
driveway or the parking lot of the customer’s
business. This is an extraordinary customer
satisfaction program that directly clauses
word of mouth. In addition, the company
sends multipage questionnaires to its
customers, which not only assess customer
satisfaction, but also cause customers
to realize how satisfied they are.
Do you think that only a luxury, high
profit car company can afford this? Then,
how do explain...
The Saturn Corp. has
a car club and has built its customers
into a “family” that is nothing
short of miraculous. The company even
conducts a nationwide barbecue for all
of its customers, and some of them drive
thousands of miles to attend!
Harley-Davidson conducts
events around the country, often with
the top executives of Harley attending,
of course on their own “hogs.”
Netscape Navigator was
built entirely upon word of mouth. They
initially captured about 90 percent of
the Web browser market before they took
their first ad. They did it with a combination
of giving away the first versions of
their product and word of mouth, primarily
on the Internet.
Celestial Seasonings Herbal
Tea: during their first years,
their president, Mo Siegel, enclosed
a note each box of tea with words to
the effect that they are a small company
that cannot afford to advertise. He
asked people to tell their friends
about his wonderful herbal teas or,
better yet, to serve it to all their
friends.
PackRat: (how word
of mouth destroyed a product.) PackRat
was probably the best personal information
management software on the market. However,
when they released their version 5, it
did not work very well. Their loyal customers,
many of whom were participating in a
forum on CompuServe, tried to help each
other through the problems, but then
quickly turned against the product when
many of them felt that they were not
being dealt with in a straightforward
manner. They started asking each other
what the best product to switch to was,
and most decided it was a product called
Ecco. Many switched, told their friends,
and PackRat was virtually dead while
Ecco took off.
The Internet: probably
the most important communication advance
in human history—even more important
than the printing press, the products
of which (books) could only be used by
the elite until relatively recent times.
It took off almost entirely on its own
through word of mouth. No one owns it,
it is no one’s product. People
told people, who told people. An amazing
phenomenon, especially when you think
about it from the point of view of marketing.
It took off with no marketing, not even
a product!
Apple Computer: its
customers became almost a cult. Apple
computer is another example of companies—like
Noxzema and Hershey—which did not
advertise until very late in the game,
and relied almost entirely upon word
of mouth in the form of dealer recommendations
and friends telling friends.
Laradopa: the story
of L-Dopa had enough drama to inspire
a film, Awakenings. No surprise then,
that it stands as an extremely powerful
word of mouth case study.
At its inception, Laradopa was viewed
with high hopes by the medical community.
It promised to remedy dopamine deficiency
that was causing devastating effects
in the brains of Parkinson’s disease
sufferers. As with many “miracle
drugs” however, there was the problematic
issue of side effects.
Word of mouth threatened to tank this
product before it had barely gotten off
the ground: the scuttlebutt among physicians
was that the side effects of L-Dopa were
far worse than the symptoms it was meant
to treat. Sales plummeted to one-fifth
of their previous level.
Hoffman La Roche engaged me to develop
a program teaching physicians how to
use the drug effectively. Physicians’ negative
word of mouth was revealed through focus
groups. Then, group sessions with a prominent
neurologist determined how physicians
could learn to put L-Dopa to good use.
Through teleconferenced seminars, doctors
were taught that all they needed to do
was fine-tune the dosage and the promise
of the drug would be fulfilled. Sales
of L-Dopa jumped more than tenfold. There
had been four competing manufacturers
in the market, prior to my sessions.
Two of them pulled their product off
the market, reeling from the aftershocks
of the powerful seminars.
Ocuflox: in this case,
teleconferenced word-of-mouth sessions
were used to transform a superior, but
unheralded product, into a dominant market
force.
In 1995, a new class of antibiotics
was introduced for the treatment and
prevention of eye infection. The first
version of this antibiotic to reach the
market was extremely successful. It seems
that ophthalmologists were simply too
comfortable with the existing drug to
bother switching to Ocuflox, taking an “if
it ain’t broke, don’t fix
it” attitude. They had not been
swayed by the improvements offered in
Ocuflox.
That all changed when we implemented
word-of-mouth sessions and doctors listened
to four clinical investigators who explained
the new frontiers in antibiotic use,
and why the benefits of Ocuflox were
so important. One of the more persuasive
advantages was the greater penetration
that Ocuflox achieves. It took the word
of the mouth of respected professionals
to move the doctors into action, and
the product into his rightful position
as the market leader.
Prilosec: Gastroenterologists
were favorable towards this superior
anti-ulcer and heartburn medicine. They
knew it worked well, but a prominent
FDA warning in the prescribing information
gave them cold feet. What they needed
was a positive signal from the most influential
experts in the field, giving them the
green light to use Prilosec.
We conducted a series of teleconferences
with several of the most respected specialists
in the country, together with expert
clinical investigators. The information
that came from these sessions convinced
enough physicians to set into motion
the largest sales jump in pharmaceutical
history. The numbers exploded from 300
million dollars to 1.3 billion dollars.
What word of mouth can teach us about
the rest of direct marketing
As you can see, I tend to approach all
marketing from the perspective of word
of mouth and how it can accelerate the
decision process.
Let me take you on a very useful tangent
for a few moments. The word of mouth
orientation is just one perspective or
viewpoint. There are many other places
from which to view marketing, such as
from the point of view of advertising,
sales, promotion, etc. No particular
viewpoint is more valid than any other.
Orientations, viewpoints, perspectives,
angles, and standpoints are just places
from which to look at things from a particular
perspective. On the other hand, the ideas
and beliefs that come from looking at
things from another angle, may be right
or wrong, but the place from which you
look is just that, only a place.
However, orientations differ greatly
in how fruitful they are in helping us
know and organize the world. Some are
highly illuminating, such as “how
would this look to a child, or someone
who didn’t understand the field?” “How
does this look from my customer’s
point of view?” Some are singularly
unfruitful lines of approach, or viewpoints: “how
can I sell my product?” “How
can I get people to use my product?” Unfortunately,
these last two are the usual approaches
to marketing, but they are narcissistic
points of view. They are not wrong, but
if they are our only perspectives, they
tend to lead us to neglect the customer’s
viewpoint, and therefore lead us into
ineffective ways of marketing. They can
be an invitation to put on blunders.
It is also worth pointing out that the
only way to look beyond superficialities,
to see through illusion and to create
anything worthwhile is to look at it
from more than one perspective. Walk
around it, look from above and below,
get inside it, imagine it differently,
reinvented it, etc.
What does this have to do with my word
of mouth orientation?
Everything.
I am suggesting that you keep whenever
orientations and perspectives have worked
for you in the past, such as advertising
and/or sales perspectives. In addition,
however, I urge you to look at all of
your marketing as a word of mouth generating
system. If, for most products, it is
the word of mouth that triggers the sales,
is it not important to look at what triggers
the word of mouth? What if all elements
of marketing, such as sales, advertising,
direct mail, etc., were not oriented
toward directly persuading people to
use the product? Instead, what if all
your marketing elements were organized
around causing people to talk about the
product in a way that would get them
to use more, and get their friends and
colleagues to use more?
Sometimes the “long way ‘round” can
be the fastest. In fact, some would argue
that going after word of mouth directly
is not the long way around. It is what
happens anyway: marketing leads to word
of mouth, which leads to sales. Why not
try organizing everything around word
of mouth, since it is the central part
of the mix?
There are many ways to accomplish this,
such as testimonial ads, materials that
describe case studies of how customers
use the product successfully, endorsements,
product seminars and the like. These
are usually very effective, which is
why these methods are often overused.
But these techniques, and dozens of
others that can trigger massive amounts
of word of mouth, are usually used piecemeal.
They need to be organized into a campaign,
so that each element supports and amplifies
each other.
That's what we do in our word of mouth
campaign consulting.
What I am urging you to do is to consider
a total approach. What if all parts of
your marketing were focused singlemindedly
on one goal: getting people to talk favorably
about your product? I know this is extreme,
because you’ll always need things
like closing pieces, order forms, etc.,
but it is very productive to consider
marketing from this orientation. When
you look at a marketing system from this
perspective—as a word of mouth
generation system—you will see
it in a whole different light that reveals
many opportunities.
[For instance, if you look at the marketing
communications, you will almost always
see elements that could not possibly
generate word of mouth. Or, if generated
could not survive from one person to
another. You will typically see communications
that are asserting facts that are unproven,
in a brute force attempt to convince
skeptics, instead of simple quotes that
will remove all doubt.]
I cannot even begin to give you a flavor
for how many opportunities are lost,
how much more effective most marketing
mixes could be made if they were viewed
from the perspective of word of mouth.
It is routine to be able to increase
sales multi-fold (yes, 2-5 times!) by
tuning your marketing to the word of
mouth note.
[Back
to home page]
|